Performance and UX
Speed and usability directly affect revenue and conversion.
- • Web vitals
- • UI bottlenecks
- • Real user flows
An audit clears out technical debt that's blocking conversion and driving up maintenance costs.
Workflow: Audit -> prioritize -> fix sprint -> re-measure. Pricing: Range depends on scope and depth of review. Lowers the odds of expensive emergency fixes down the line.
A map of technical risk
An implementation plan without chaos
A measurable effect after the audit
Speed and usability directly affect revenue and conversion.
Fewer regressions and emergency fixes.
Good fit for small businesses and first-round optimizations
A good audit isn't a PDF report — it's a technically implementable roadmap with priorities and success criteria.
The technical block shows how the project lives after the first release: architecture, code quality, constraints and handoff.
Performance, code quality, architectural risk, release stability, and critical UX/SEO constraints.
Cost depends on audit depth, project scale, and the number of system integrations involved.
Yes, in Fluw the audit and the fixes can happen as a single, continuous process.
By tracking speed, release stability, SEO performance, and business conversion metrics.